|
|
Obama & Socialism? Thoughts About Obama’s Tax Plan
By Kyle Van Horn
The
other day, I was reading a debate on a political discussion board among
some people I know in America. They were going back and forth
passionately, one fighting for Obama, the other for McCain, as if their
lives depended on a victory for their candidate.
Obama supporter: ...All I can say is change your TV off of
Fox News, and step away from the remote. I am in awe of just how proud
you are of McCain/Palin, quite possibly the most embarrassing ticket in
our lifetime.
McCain supporter: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122385651698727257.html
Read this article, then decide...
Obama supporter: Only if you read "The Audacity of Hope",
then decide. Maybe if John McCain had a single thought of his own on
where to take our country, I would be willing to listen to those who
feel it's productive to bash Obama. My vote will be cast tomorrow in
early voting, and it's not even close. I have no interest in watching a
SNL skit for the next 4 years. Our country has become enough of a joke
over the last 8 years.
McCain supporter: McCain has more experience than Obama,
even Palin has more experience than Obama. But, I guess if you're in
favor of Socialism then Obama is the way to go.
The debate goes on in much the same way for a long, long time. Neither
side makes any intriguing or thought provoking statements. Basically,
they just go back and forth, pulling from the bag of prepared blanket
statements issued by the Obama and McCain camps and/or the media that
supports them.
No real issues are discussed aside from who has the better tax plan,
which has been on everyone’s minds since Joe “the plumber” came into our
lives. Even then, it wasn’t really about the numbers. The main issue of
concern was whether or not Obama was a Socialist. Not only is he a black
man. Not only is his middle name Hussein. Now he is something far worse,
a Marxist who’s interested in, dare I say? Spreading the wealth!
Before I added my own two cents, …
Hi guys. I've read all your comments, and frankly, I'm quite surprised
that any of you could feel so strongly for either half of the duopoly. I
know most are unwilling to give Ralph Nader a shot, but is that opinion
based on his policies (which are far more logical than either McCain's
or Obama's), or just that you don't want to vote for the guy you know
will lose? Imagine if everyone could answer this question honestly. You
know what the answer would be. Wouldn't that be something? If we could
turn the system on its head? If we could actually make the people's
voice heard for the first time in most of our voting lifetimes? Just a
thought.
… I read the article put forth as an argument against Obama by the
McCain supporter above. Well, upon first glance, I noticed the article
came from the Wall Street Journal. After all the fabrication and
outright lies I’ve read in that paper in the past, I had little optimism
that I would read anything worthwhile. Nevertheless, I continued.
The article was entitled “Obama’s 95% Illusion”. The article’s aim was
to break down Obama’s supposed “tax cut” plan and expose it for the
supposed Socialism it really is. The author’s theory is that Obama is
trying to pull the wool over our eyes in order to put a plan into motion
that will give the richest 5% of Americans “one of the largest tax
increases ever.”
The article goes over the seven credits included in Obama’s plan will
help out the poorest Americans. These include a $500 tax credit to
people who make less than $75K per year, a $4,000 tax credit for
college, a 10% mortgage interest tax credit, a “clean car” tax credit of
up to $7,000, and other credits that will benefit people who are trying
to raise families, buy homes, pay child support, and save for college
tuition costs.
“Here’s the political catch,” says the author. “All but the clean car
credit would be ‘refundable’… In other words, they are an income
transfer – a federal check – from taxpayers to non-taxpayers.” The
author leaves the reader with little choice but to view this as an Obama
preparation to spread the wealth. This is not true Socialism, but most
American readers, who have never been properly educated about any
economic system, and who view “Capitalism” and “democracy” as
synonymous, might finish the article thinking Obama is disguising his
dirty Socialist agenda as a tax cut.
The article goes on to explain the ins and outs of Obama’s atrocity, and
how not only will the wealthy suffer the majority of the country’s tax
burden, but how the lazy poor will surely have less incentive to work
hard as their tax credits will vanish more and more every time they move
into a higher tax bracket.
This article really got me thinking. It poses so many questions in my
mind that I didn’t even know where to begin once I got back on the
discussion board. So instead of writing there again, other than to tell
the people there what I’m about to tell you, I decided to put my
thoughts down on paper and direct them here.
My first thought while reading the article was this: If it’s true what
the article was saying ; if Obama really is trying to initiate
Socialist-type programs in America, why would he want to disguise them?
The obvious answer to this question is that Americans have been force
fed anti-Marxist propaganda for so many decades that the word
“Socialist” cannot be mentioned without a gasp accompanied by thoughts
of the old Soviet Union, North Korean high-kick marches, Fidel’s beard
and military fatigues, tanks and missiles being paraded down the street,
endless lines of impoverished people waiting for bread, and leaders who
don’t speak English spitting fiery rhetoric at faceless crowds of
onlookers. Never would a major party candidate in the Land of the Free
openly mix his name up with such images.
The McCain supporter put the article in question forth as an argument
not to vote for Obama, and the author of the article is obviously trying
to sway readers to vote for McCain. This being said, if anything, this
article swayed me a little closer to Obama. No doubt, my opinion is
driven by the fact that I am aware of the real meaning Socialism in the
21st Century, which is, among other things, a democratically elected
leader encouraging people to make better lives for themselves by
organizing at the grassroots level. ( http://links.org.au/node/503 ). By
looking at Obama’s platform as a whole, we can easily see that he has no
intention of sparking the revolution of which our country is so
desperately in need. For a split second, though, the article gave me a
glimmer of hope, pun intended. Maybe, just maybe, despite the fact that
Obama is the recipient of an absurd amount of corporate funding, he is
using the system ingeniously. Maybe he’s letting the special interest
groups pay for his election to, in turn, reverse the flow of capital on
them and help those who really need help once he is elected. Heading
toward the election, that’s what some of the more liberal Obama
supporters seem to believe. I know, it’s wishful thinking. But maybe.
One thing that is not a maybe, but a certainty is this: People like me
don’t read the Wall Street Journal regularly, although I will pick it up
from time to time to see what’s happening in the world of illusion as
well as to keep myself motivated to get the truth out there at all
costs. The people who read articles like this regularly are the ones who
go away from reading feeling real fear and anger inside. They think
those lazy poor people don’t want to go out there and get a job. The
poor just want to sit around on the couch all day and do drugs and make
more poor babies and mooch off of us, the hard working taxpayers.
I will be the first to admit. Some do. But do opponents of Obama’s plan
really believe that if, and this is a huge “if”, a father of a poor
family in America is about to start making $75K for the first time not
only in his life, but for the first time in his entire bloodline, that
he will cease to work hard and commence sucking the system dry? The
people who oppose Obama’s plan underestimate the pride and dignity of
America’s working class.
No system will ever be perfect for everyone in America in that there
will always be people out there looking to get by doing as little work
as possible. But I can guarantee, having grown up in a household with
two parents working full time who still needed government assistance
that, one, a majority of the poor living in America are hard workers,
and two, the majority of the poor in America yearn for a better life and
still believe (in varying degrees) in the American dream. A book that
illustrates this idea very well is Nickel and Dimed by Barbara
Ehrenreich. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickel_and_Dimed
Of course there are people who have worked hard for years in America and
have achieved success. It is possible. And I am sorry for those kinds of
people if they have to dole out their hard earned money to someone whom
they feel is fundamentally unworthy of such charity. Those kinds of
people, the ones who start with nothing and build fortune 500 companies,
are the kinds of stories we see on Oprah. They are so touching. They
keep that idea in the backs of the minds of all poor Americans that the
American dream is within reach... that we might win the lottery, or that
we might somehow, upon some stroke of fortune, strike it rich beyond our
wildest expectations!
For the majority of Americans, though, this will not happen. Ever. And
those Americans, the hard workers who are the unassuming victims of US
Capitalism, the Americans who still believe that they’re working hard to
better themselves and their country, deserve a little payback. They
deserve everything Obama’s so-called Socialist programs will give them
and more. In fact, I’ll go as far as saying they need more than Obama’s
plan, which offers something with a trace amount of a hint of something
that might one day possibly resemble real Socialism. They need real
Socialism. This country has been catering to the wealthy elite for so
long that most people are utterly incapable of imagining a better
system. There is a better system, though. A system where there are no
elites. A system that doesn’t naturally widen the gap between the rich
and the poor with each passing second.
The system which exists in the United States today not only keeps its
own poor in perpetually worsening conditions, but contributes to the
rising poverty rate worldwide year after year, and election after
meaningless election. As far as the poor are concerned, the current
system simply doesn’t work. Why not shake up the system a bit? What are
Americans afraid of? If they take an honest look at what the US is
turning into, do they not see a state that is continually moving toward
martial law anyway? Are they afraid that any aspect of Socialism within
our society will result in a dictatorship?
American citizens, the majority of whom work hard yet still struggle to
get by, need to change their way of thinking. As we can see by the
political discussion board that helped inspire this article, it will be
difficult to fight against generations of carefully planned
indoctrination. But I encourage the good people of America to look at
evolving Socialist programs around the world. And I don’t mean look at
what publications like the Wall Street Journal say about them. Look how
they are being built from the bottom up. Look at how they don’t cater to
the wealthy elite, but at how they work for and with the hard workers
who make the country run.
In fact, look at any current revolution, and examine both sides
carefully. Who hates Hugo Chavez? The elite who got rich off the
country’s natural wealth for centuries? Who hates Evo Morales? The elite
who are trying to keep a firm grasp on the country’s resources while
continuing to let the poor starve. Who hates Fidel Castro? The Cuban
elite families, most of whom reside in Florida now, who were forced to
give up their stronghold on the country’s capital in order for the
masses to have food, clothing, and shelter. Who hates all of these guys?
The US government, because these leaders are no longer letting big US
companies go into their countries to exploit their natural resources at
the expense of the majority who live there. Who else hates these guys?
You. Why? I’m not quite sure. Are you?
More than likely, if you are reading this article, you are one of those
people who would benefit under a true Socialist system like the ones we
see evolving around the world. You are a hard worker striving toward a
more comfortable life.
I am not writing today to support Barack Obama as most of his policies
are mirror images of those of John McCain and thus leave a lot to be
desired. Barack Obama is not a Socialist, nor will he ever be a
Socialist. But what if he were? Would it really be so bad? Really? To
put it simply, I am disappointed at an American public who, when faced
with a glimmer of hope for change, let the simple misunderstanding of a
word discourage them from making an educated decision about the future
of their country.
A final thought. More often than not, when I argue points such as this
one with the regular American people I know, I am answered with a
condescending grin at the very least. Otherwise, I’ll be answered with
some patronizing remarks, hinting at how adorable it is that I want to
save the world from evil. And far too often I am labeled outright as a
traitor. A traitor! A man who hates America! A terrorist! Well, I
disagree.
“I cannot live without books.”
“The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who
reads nothing but newspapers.”
“Enlighten the people, generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body
and mind will vanish like spirits at the dawn of day.”
“The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain
occasions, that I wish it always to be kept alive.”
“The will of the people is the only legitimate foundation of any
government, and to protect its free expression should be our first
object.”
“We in America do not have government by the majority. We have
government by the majority who participate.”
“Every generation needs a new revolution.”
These are just a few of things Thomas Jefferson had to say not about
Capitalism, which is NOT the idea that America was founded upon despite
what some may believe, but democracy. If I am not a patriot, well,
neither was he.
|
|